{"id":39531,"date":"2025-05-28T16:40:17","date_gmt":"2025-05-28T16:40:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.preprod.io\/communique-du-rapporteur-general-du-conseil-de-la-concurrence-7\/"},"modified":"2026-02-04T15:53:25","modified_gmt":"2026-02-04T15:53:25","slug":"statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council"},"content":{"rendered":"

In accordance with the provisions of Article 29 of Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition as amended and supplemented, the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council has notified a company implicated in anticompetitive practices in the digital platforms market for ordering and delivering meals, both at the national and local levels.<\/p>\n

It should be recalled that, within the framework of the exercise of its missions and attributions provided for by the Constitution, Law No. 20-13 on the Competition Council, as well as Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition, as amended and supplemented, aiming at regulating competition in markets and protecting consumer interests, the Competition Council took up the matter ex officio by decision No. 20\/D\/2024 of February 19, 2024, and initiated an investigation to verify the existence of presumed anticompetitive practices in the market of digital platforms for ordering and delivering meals, both at the national and local levels.<\/p>\n

The investigative and inquiry actions carried out by the competent services of the Competition Council revealed the existence of anticompetitive practices implemented by a company active in the market of digital platforms for ordering and delivering meals. These practices involve the abusive exploitation by the said company of its dominant position in the aforementioned market, the abusive exploitation of the economic dependence in which its commercial partners find themselves, and the existence of abusively low pricing practices.<\/p>\n

The notification of the grievances addressed to the implicated party in this context opens the adversarial procedure and guarantees the exercise of the defense rights of said party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Legal framework reminder: <\/strong><\/p>\n

The abusive exploitation of a dominant position or an economic dependence situation is strictly prohibited by Article 7 of Law No. 104-12 as amended and supplemented, which provides<\/em><\/strong>: “Is prohibited, when it has the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition, the abusive exploitation by a company or a group of companies:<\/em><\/p>\n

1- <\/em>of a dominant position on the domestic market or a substantial part thereof; <\/em><\/p>\n

2- of an economic dependence situation in which a customer or supplier finds themselves with no other equivalent alternative. Abuse may consist in particular of refusal to sell, tied sales, or discriminatory sales conditions as well as in the termination of established commercial relationships, solely because the partner refuses to submit to unjustified commercial terms. It may also consist in directly or indirectly imposing a minimum resale price on a product or good, on the price of a service, or on a commercial margin<\/em>.”<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

It is important to specify, finally, that the notification of grievances addressed by the investigative and inquiry services does not prejudge the final decision of the Council. Indeed, only the Competition Council’s board can, after an investigation conducted in an adversarial manner respecting the defense rights of the concerned party and after a Council session, rule on the merits of the grievances in question.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Done in Rabat on May 28, 2025<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In accordance with the provisions of Article 29 of Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition as amended and supplemented, the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council has notified a company implicated in anticompetitive practices in the digital platforms market for ordering and delivering meals, both at the national and local levels. It should be recalled that, within the framework of the exercise of its missions and attributions provided for by the Constitution, Law No. 20-13 on the Competition Council, as well as Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition, as amended and supplemented, aiming at regulating competition in markets and protecting consumer interests, the Competition Council took up the matter ex officio by decision No. 20\/D\/2024 of February 19, 2024, and initiated an investigation to verify the existence of presumed anticompetitive practices in the market of digital platforms for ordering and delivering meals, both at the national and local levels. The investigative and inquiry actions carried out by the competent services of the Competition Council revealed the existence of anticompetitive practices implemented by a company active in the market of digital platforms for ordering and delivering meals. These practices involve the abusive exploitation by the said company of its dominant position in the aforementioned market, the abusive exploitation of the economic dependence in which its commercial partners find themselves, and the existence of abusively low pricing practices. The notification of the grievances addressed to the implicated party in this context opens the adversarial procedure and guarantees the exercise of the defense rights of said party. Legal framework reminder: The abusive exploitation of a dominant position or an economic dependence situation is strictly prohibited by Article 7 of Law No. 104-12 as amended and supplemented, which provides: “Is prohibited, when it has the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition, the abusive exploitation by a company or a group of companies: 1- of a dominant position on the domestic market or a substantial part thereof; 2- of an economic dependence situation in which a customer or supplier finds themselves with no other equivalent alternative. Abuse may consist in particular of refusal to sell, tied sales, or discriminatory sales conditions as well as in the termination of established commercial relationships, solely because the partner refuses to submit to unjustified commercial terms. It may also consist in directly or indirectly imposing a minimum resale price on a product or good, on the price of a service, or on a commercial margin.” It is important to specify, finally, that the notification of grievances addressed by the investigative and inquiry services does not prejudge the final decision of the Council. Indeed, only the Competition Council’s board can, after an investigation conducted in an adversarial manner respecting the defense rights of the concerned party and after a Council session, rule on the merits of the grievances in question.   Done in Rabat on May 28, 2025<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":34433,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[352],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-press-releases"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nStatement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council - Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council - Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In accordance with the provisions of Article 29 of Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition as amended and supplemented, the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council has notified a company implicated in anticompetitive practices in the digital platforms market for ordering and delivering meals, both at the national and local levels. It should be recalled that, within the framework of the exercise of its missions and attributions provided for by the Constitution, Law No. 20-13 on the Competition Council, as well as Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition, as amended and supplemented, aiming at regulating competition in markets and protecting consumer interests, the Competition Council took up the matter ex officio by decision No. 20\/D\/2024 of February 19, 2024, and initiated an investigation to verify the existence of presumed anticompetitive practices in the market of digital platforms for ordering and delivering meals, both at the national and local levels. The investigative and inquiry actions carried out by the competent services of the Competition Council revealed the existence of anticompetitive practices implemented by a company active in the market of digital platforms for ordering and delivering meals. These practices involve the abusive exploitation by the said company of its dominant position in the aforementioned market, the abusive exploitation of the economic dependence in which its commercial partners find themselves, and the existence of abusively low pricing practices. The notification of the grievances addressed to the implicated party in this context opens the adversarial procedure and guarantees the exercise of the defense rights of said party. Legal framework reminder: The abusive exploitation of a dominant position or an economic dependence situation is strictly prohibited by Article 7 of Law No. 104-12 as amended and supplemented, which provides: “Is prohibited, when it has the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition, the abusive exploitation by a company or a group of companies: 1- of a dominant position on the domestic market or a substantial part thereof; 2- of an economic dependence situation in which a customer or supplier finds themselves with no other equivalent alternative. Abuse may consist in particular of refusal to sell, tied sales, or discriminatory sales conditions as well as in the termination of established commercial relationships, solely because the partner refuses to submit to unjustified commercial terms. It may also consist in directly or indirectly imposing a minimum resale price on a product or good, on the price of a service, or on a commercial margin.” It is important to specify, finally, that the notification of grievances addressed by the investigative and inquiry services does not prejudge the final decision of the Council. Indeed, only the Competition Council’s board can, after an investigation conducted in an adversarial manner respecting the defense rights of the concerned party and after a Council session, rule on the merits of the grievances in question.   Done in Rabat on May 28, 2025\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-28T16:40:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-04T15:53:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"690\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Youssef OTMANE\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Youssef OTMANE\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Youssef OTMANE\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/24b4bd1e24ccf3057c8fcb57662a0b81\"},\"headline\":\"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-28T16:40:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-04T15:53:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":491,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Press Releases\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council - Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-28T16:40:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-04T15:53:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/24b4bd1e24ccf3057c8fcb57662a0b81\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":690},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc\",\"description\":\"Conseil de la concurrence\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/24b4bd1e24ccf3057c8fcb57662a0b81\",\"name\":\"Youssef OTMANE\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conseil-concurrence.ma\\\/en\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council - Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council - Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc","og_description":"In accordance with the provisions of Article 29 of Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition as amended and supplemented, the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council has notified a company implicated in anticompetitive practices in the digital platforms market for ordering and delivering meals, both at the national and local levels. It should be recalled that, within the framework of the exercise of its missions and attributions provided for by the Constitution, Law No. 20-13 on the Competition Council, as well as Law No. 104-12 on freedom of prices and competition, as amended and supplemented, aiming at regulating competition in markets and protecting consumer interests, the Competition Council took up the matter ex officio by decision No. 20\/D\/2024 of February 19, 2024, and initiated an investigation to verify the existence of presumed anticompetitive practices in the market of digital platforms for ordering and delivering meals, both at the national and local levels. The investigative and inquiry actions carried out by the competent services of the Competition Council revealed the existence of anticompetitive practices implemented by a company active in the market of digital platforms for ordering and delivering meals. These practices involve the abusive exploitation by the said company of its dominant position in the aforementioned market, the abusive exploitation of the economic dependence in which its commercial partners find themselves, and the existence of abusively low pricing practices. The notification of the grievances addressed to the implicated party in this context opens the adversarial procedure and guarantees the exercise of the defense rights of said party. Legal framework reminder: The abusive exploitation of a dominant position or an economic dependence situation is strictly prohibited by Article 7 of Law No. 104-12 as amended and supplemented, which provides: “Is prohibited, when it has the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition, the abusive exploitation by a company or a group of companies: 1- of a dominant position on the domestic market or a substantial part thereof; 2- of an economic dependence situation in which a customer or supplier finds themselves with no other equivalent alternative. Abuse may consist in particular of refusal to sell, tied sales, or discriminatory sales conditions as well as in the termination of established commercial relationships, solely because the partner refuses to submit to unjustified commercial terms. It may also consist in directly or indirectly imposing a minimum resale price on a product or good, on the price of a service, or on a commercial margin.” It is important to specify, finally, that the notification of grievances addressed by the investigative and inquiry services does not prejudge the final decision of the Council. Indeed, only the Competition Council’s board can, after an investigation conducted in an adversarial manner respecting the defense rights of the concerned party and after a Council session, rule on the merits of the grievances in question.   Done in Rabat on May 28, 2025","og_url":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/","og_site_name":"Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc","article_published_time":"2025-05-28T16:40:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-04T15:53:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":690,"url":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Youssef OTMANE","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Youssef OTMANE","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/"},"author":{"name":"Youssef OTMANE","@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/24b4bd1e24ccf3057c8fcb57662a0b81"},"headline":"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council","datePublished":"2025-05-28T16:40:17+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-04T15:53:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/"},"wordCount":491,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png","articleSection":["Press Releases"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/","url":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/","name":"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council - Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png","datePublished":"2025-05-28T16:40:17+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-04T15:53:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/24b4bd1e24ccf3057c8fcb57662a0b81"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-CC-3-scaled.png","width":2560,"height":690},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/statement-from-the-general-rapporteur-of-the-competition-council-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Statement from the General Rapporteur of the Competition Council"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/","name":"Conseil de la concurrence du Maroc","description":"Conseil de la concurrence","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/24b4bd1e24ccf3057c8fcb57662a0b81","name":"Youssef OTMANE","url":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39531"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39531\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44789,"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39531\/revisions\/44789"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34433"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=39531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conseil-concurrence.ma\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=39531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}